flow cytometric dna analysis and histopathologic re-evaluation of paraffin embedded samples from hydatidiform moles and hydropic abortions
Authors
abstract
background: distinction of hydatidiform moles (hms) from non-molar abortions and sub-classification of hms are important for clinical practice; yet, diagnosis based solely on morphology is affected by interobserver variability. the objective of this study was to determine the role of dna flow cytometry in distinguishing molar from non-molar pregnancies. materials and methods: this retrospective study was conducted at the department of pathology, women’s hospital, tehran university of medical sciences, tehran, iran, between 2006 and 2010. dna ploidy analysis and histopathologic re-evaluation were performed on paraffin-embedded tissue from 36 (17 complete and 19 partial) molar and 24 hydropic abortus (ha) cases which were previously diagnosed based on histomorphologic study. results: of the 17 cases initially diagnosed as complete hm (chm), 9 were diploid, 2 were triploid, 5 were tetraploid and 1 was aneuploid. of the 19 initial partial hms (phms), 2, 8, 1 and 8 cases were diploid, triploid, tetraploid and aneuploid, respectively. in the initial ha category (n=24), 14 diploid, 1 triploid, 5 tetraploid, and 4 aneuploid cases existed. following flow cytometry and histopathologic reevaluation, 1 case with previous diagnosis of ha was reclassified as phm, 2 initial phms were reclassified as chm and 2 initial chms were categorized as phm. conclusion: the results show that correct diagnosis of pmh is the main challenge in histological diagnosis of gestational trophoblastic disease (gtd). dna flow cytometric analysis could be an informative supplement to the histological interpretation of molar and hydropic placentas.
similar resources
Flow Cytometric DNA Analysis and Histopathologic Re-Evaluation of Paraffin Embedded Samples from Hydatidiform Moles and Hydropic Abortions
Background Distinction of hydatidiform moles (HMs) from non-molar abortions and sub-classification of HMs are important for clinical practice; yet, diagnosis based solely on morphology is affected by interobserver variability. The objective of this study was to determine the role of DNA flow cytometry in distinguishing molar from non-molar pregnancies. MaterialsAndMethods This retrospective stu...
full textFlow Cytometric DNA Analysis and Histopathologic Re-Evaluation of Paraffin Embedded Samples from Hydatidiform Moles and Hydropic Abortions
BACKGROUND Distinction of hydatidiform moles (HMs) from non-molar abortions and sub-classification of HMs are important for clinical practice; yet, diagnosis based solely on morphology is affected by interobserver variability. The objective of this study was to determine the role of DNA flow cytometry in distinguishing molar from non-molar pregnancies. MATERIALS AND METHODS This retrospective...
full textKi-67 Expression in Hydatidiform Moles and Hydropic Abortions
BACKGROUND Differential diagnosis of hydatidiform moles from non-molar specimens as well as their sub-classification such as complete and partial hydatidiform moles are important for clinical management and accurate risk assessment for persistent gestational trophoblastic disease, but diagnosis based solely on histomorphology suffers from poor interobserver and intraobserver reproducibility. ...
full textki-۶۷ expression in hydatidiform moles and hydropic abortions
conclusions despite the significant differences , ki-67 immunostaining could not be helpful in distinguishing molar placentas from hydropic abortions as well as partial from complete hydatidiform moles, because there are considerable overlaps between results in different categories. objectives this study was undertaken to determine whether the expression of ki-67 protein could differentiate the...
full textUse of proliferation cell nuclear antigen immunoreactivity for distinguishing hydropic abortions from partial hydatidiform moles.
AIMS To determine whether the expression of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) in villous cytotrophoblast could distinguish between placental tissue from a hydropic abortion and that from a partial hydatidiform mole. METHODS Tissue from 18 partial hydatidiform moles, 15 hydropic abortions, five normal first trimester placentas and five normal full term placentas were immunostained for ...
full textDNA flow cytometric analysis in variable types of hydropic placentas
BACKGROUND Differential diagnosis between complete hydatidiform mole, partial hydatidiform mole and hydropic abortion, known as hydropic placentas is still a challenge for pathologists but it is very important for patient management. OBJECTIVE We analyzed the nuclear DNA content of various types of hydropic placentas by flowcytometry. MATERIALS AND METHODS DNA ploidy analysis was performed ...
full textMy Resources
Save resource for easier access later
Journal title:
international journal of fertility and sterilityجلد ۹، شماره ۳، صفحات ۳۲۲-۳۲۸
Hosted on Doprax cloud platform doprax.com
copyright © 2015-2023